@charlag huh, that sounds like the discussion we had on the peertube.social account. That instance is run by me and some others, it has nothing to do with framasoft. Unless you are talking about something else, but framasoft doesn't run any public peertube instance.
@felix uh, okay. I didn't like the response either way tbh.
@charlag the donations we receive just about cover the hosting for the server. If we received more money, we would definitely split it between the mods. I'm all ears if you have any suggestions for getting more donations (or other types of funding).
@charlag also, does your mastodon instance pay a salary to its mods?
@felix I'm the admin and almost the only user here lol
@felix yeah, I totally get it, I just think that the response should've said that instead of what it said.
And yes, m.s. pays its mods for example but that's an extreme example
@charlag and I think that people shouldn't have demanded that a fedi instance with 20€ per month in donations get paid mods. But yet here we are.
@felix no one demanded it, idk why you think that
the @peertubesocial account ask if anybody would like to come and help out with moderation (it's not so much the excessive workload but the fact that we don't speak all the world's languages right now). Answers came like 'will you pay me?'
Framatube (Framasoft's instance) does not have open registrations so they don't really have to worry about moderation that much.
In the end, they don't see the hardship of moderation bc they don't have an instance like m.s
But comments and non-local videos need to be moderated indeed. I am actually surprised they haven't implemented better moderation for this as they should theorically need it.
I'm going to test to see if some of P.S blacklisted remote videos have been moderated on Framatube.
This is a tiny, friendly fedi server!